Last week, Microsoft’s longtime CEO Steve Ballmer surprised people with his retirement announcement. A lot of the commentary on this has been insipid, but some has been great. In particular Ben Thompson’s wonderful posts helped me understand something I’ve long been puzzled about. Why did Microsoft build Windows 8 with both a touch screen interface… Continue reading The stock market blindly lusts after exploitative monopolies
Author: Nathan Taylor
I blog at http://praxtime.com on tech trends and the near future. I'm on twitter as @ntaylor963.
Homo Erectus – not so different from modern humans
Ancient Greeks believed ”whoever is not Greek is a barbarian.” Viewing other groups as subhuman is as old as humankind. In fact one way to measure historical progress is to note the expanding definition of what it means to be human, including more races, genders, cultures. Today we include every human on the planet. But let’s… Continue reading Homo Erectus – not so different from modern humans
In favor of the Super Early Anthropocene
The Anthropocene is a proposed epoch to add to the Geologic Time Scale (GTS), marking the start of human dominance of Earth’s climate and ecology. Our current Holocene epoch started 11,700 years ago and runs to present. At this point it seems likely the International Commission on Stratigraphy, which decides such things, will approve the Anthropocene epoch. But picking… Continue reading In favor of the Super Early Anthropocene
With some sympathy for Orson Scott Card
Orson Scott Card’s best and most popular sci-fi novel Ender’s Game is being turned into a movie coming out in November. Harrison Ford is Colonel Graff. Ben Kingsley is Mazer Rackham. I’m a fan of the 1985 book, and am really looking forward to the movie. But some people are boycotting Ender’s Game because Card is against gay… Continue reading With some sympathy for Orson Scott Card
Economists agree on microeconomics, not macroeconomics. The public believes the opposite.
I’ve posted about the awesomeness of economist Scott Sumner before. In particular I find Sumner’s argument that tight Fed policy is the primary cause of the 2008 recession totally convincing. See my take here. But for this post I wanted to cite Sumner on another topic. Sumner has a fun rant where he points out… Continue reading Economists agree on microeconomics, not macroeconomics. The public believes the opposite.
MOOCs and the future of college
Last week’s post on MOOCs focused on the the “bundle” of disparate things you get from attending college. Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a real threat to this bundle, in particular for job skill teaching and job credentialing, so it’s appropriate colleges are freaking out. But since MOOCs (another word for online video classes) only… Continue reading MOOCs and the future of college
The College “Bundle” and MOOC online learning
When new technology disrupts an industry, it does so by providing not just cheaper (and slightly worse) alternatives, but by splitting apart economic bundles which prior to disruption seemed innately tied together. For example John Hawks recently tweeted MOOCs are to Colleges what Craigslist is to newspapers. For consumers printed newspapers were about the news, but… Continue reading The College “Bundle” and MOOC online learning
The Economics of Artificial Intelligence
An often quoted paper by Erik Brynjolfsson and Adam Saunders starts with this great line: “We see the influence of the information age everywhere, except in the GDP statistics.” They go on to note that Information technology has been static at 4% of GDP for the past 25 years. But the economics of artificial intelligence… Continue reading The Economics of Artificial Intelligence
The Gradual Singularity
The Technological Singularity is defined as the sudden emergence of a super-intelligent computer. The classic scenario is people build an artificial intelligence capable of building a better artificial intelligence, and this process runs away with itself until you get a super-intelligent computer. See Asimov’s 1950 short story for an example. You can see why it’s… Continue reading The Gradual Singularity
Bees are to hives what neurons are to brains
Biologists consider bees to be superorganisms, where the social bonding of individual bees is so tight they exhibit behavior at the hive level. A common analogy is bees are to hives what cells are to a bee. Or to extend further, as neuron cells are to a human brain. Now the coordination of cells in… Continue reading Bees are to hives what neurons are to brains
